Showing posts with label Drone Attacks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Drone Attacks. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

About Ending Perpetual War...

There was a lot of hoopla in my city last week, as President Obama was re-inaugurated amidst large crowds. Given the centrality of Obama to our blog (we started this 4 years ago after his initial inauguration, with some of our first posts devoted to capturing the movement that developed around him that catapulted him into the presidency), I though it'd be useful to write down a few thoughts about inauguration #2. The main takeaway from his speech was that he seemed far more bold on domestic politics: the references to climate change, Stonewall, and immigration were much stronger stances than he was willing to make in his first inauguration. Second-term presidencies can bring about more activism, obviously. But, for me, the most interesting part was his discussion of the need to end perpetual war (d'uh, I do international politics). Like so much about Obama, a lot of liberals applauded this (supposedly) brave statement and felt optimism about further distancing ourselves from the Bush years. But...yeah, as seems to be frequently the case with liberals and Obama, they didn't pay attention to what he has actually done. The press didn't do a particularly good job with this either, analyzing his words more than his actions. Perhaps Barry O is really committed to shifting away from militarism. But, the reality is, he's got to walk away from a lot of his own policies to do so.

Monday, January 21, 2013

Who hasn't tried to co-opt MLK?

As we celebrate MLK Day in America today (and the second inauguration of Barack Obama, one that is definitely being linked to MLK on a few levels...more on that later), I started thinking: why do we know so little about the real King and, as a result, why are so many able to co-opt his messages?

The MLK we're told about (that I've written about before - click here and here to read more) was a man who told us to live together in peace, for whites and blacks to embrace each other, and let our kids play together. This isn't a bad message at all, of course. However, we rarely get the more complicated politics that MLK touched on. He understood the connection between racism, economics, and politics. "I have a dream" is very special and historical...but the dream MLK wanted us to get to involved addressing war, poverty, and the nature of our political system. He was pro-labor (he was assassinated while supporting sanitation workers on strike in Memphis). He was critical of the economic divide in America. He was staunchly opposed to the Vietnam war, and not supportive of our foreign policy in general. He thought we exploited the poor at home and abroad. He had problems with moderate white American leaders, who would be willing to compromise on social issues to bring about a "peace" without justice. So...yeah, not as warm and fuzzy as we hear about. Of course, reality makes him (and those who fought alongside him - one man does not make a movement) far more courageous, noble, and worthy of rememberance. It wasn't easy to fight against segregation. Fighting against segregation, Vietnam, poverty, aspects of capitalism, political dealmaking...yeah, that's a lot more challenging.

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Ewoks, Warfare, Alliances, and Modern Parallels (or: Stop Hating on Return of the Jedi)

Okay, so let me begin by stating that this post is a bit wacky. Even for me. The title by itself probably has most of you wondering what the hell is going on. This past weekend was the 30th anniversary of the release of the brilliant Star Wars sequel, The Empire Strikes Back. I love that movie, but it got me thinking about the following one (as did the continuous showings of the trilogy on TV - I can watch parts of the original Star Wars trilogy anytime), The Return of the Jedi (RotJ). This is a much-maligned movie that I actually always liked (not as much as Empire, of course) much more than most people. One of the common criticisms of Jedi was the presence of the Ewoks. Among sci-fi nerds, movie buffs, and the rest of us, the common criticism was: they're too damn cute. Having these koala-like cuddly things in the movie just killed it - you can't take it too seriously, and it was all an effort by George Lucas to get the kiddie dollar at the theater, the video store, and the toy store. Now, there's some truth to that - no doubt the Ewoks helped get more money from younger audiences. But, I think there's something much deeper to it. The Ewoks were not "cute" in the classic definition of cute. The Ewoks were victims of power politics, and were pretty courageous guerrilla warriors. Yeah, that's right. I said it. Stop hating on RotJ because of the Ewoks!

Let's review this. The Empire lands on the moon of Endor, the Ewoks home. They intrude on them and run operations on the planet. The second Death Star was built there, and the deflector shield for the infrastructure was based on the planet. So, while they weren't quite subject to an occupation, the Ewoks did have a foreign force run operations on their home planet. In other words, their sovereignty was taken away. Enter the Rebels. Under most circumstances, the Ewoks probably had no dog in the fight. However, they had foreign troops on their soil. The alliance with the Rebels was seemingly the only way to get out of this precarious situation, as they couldn't not align with a side here, like the states in the Non-Alignment Movement did during the Cold War. The Empire already violated their sovereignty, and they couldn't get that back on their own, so they needed to join with the Rebels. Thus, they had to choose sides. This isn't unlike many of the alliances formed during the Cold War, though in this case, the Ewoks had more in common with their ally, the Rebels, than did many allies during the Cold War. But the larger point is, they, like many of those states, didn't have a lot of real options.

The Empire's role in the Ewok story is not dissimilar from the controversial U.S.-led drone attacks in Pakistan, or the presence of the Guantanamo Bay detention center in Cuba. Neither are occupations, but both cause some serious sovereignty issues. The Empire wasn't (as far as I know) calling the shots on Endor. They didn't install a puppet Ewok regime. Yes, I know, this is getting a bit silly, but stay with me. However, the Ewoks were no longer able to fully function in their homes. If the area they needed to get crops from was being used by the Empire for the deflector shield, its not like they could negotiate with them over that. Even though it was their home, another party was exerting its sovereignty over the land. Just like Pakistanis don't support the U.S. drone attacks that have killed many innocent civilians (ratios vary, but no matter what, many more civilians have been killed than militants in these attacks) on their own soil, they can't really do anything about it. The Pakistani government is actually probably in cahoots with the U.S. on these attacks, or is at least looking the other way, while using oppositional rhetoric to ensure that Pakistanis think they're on their side on this issue (when they probably aren't). Fidel is most certainly not down with Gitmo, nor are most Cubans, but the U.S. keeps the base, where it has held hundreds of people at a time in legal limbo, and in a world of torture and degradation. Castro can't do anything about it. Just like the Ewoks.

So, they basically had limited options and were dragged into the conflict. Power politics came into play to some degree, though so did ideology - the Empire was never their kind of bag, while the Rebels were. Now, they were fuzzy and cute. But that plays into the more impressive part of the story that apolitical people don't get - they battled like crazy. This was David and Goliath - a 2 foot tall koala taking on armed 30 foot tall AT-ST walkers. That they did it was impressive enough, and says something about courage to do the right thing. Many died in what should have been an easy fight for the Empire to win. Of course, the Empire didn't win. The Ewoks and the Rebels won. They won with primitive weapons. They won through guerrilla warfare, not dissimilar to tactics made popular by Che Guevara. Even when the odds looked very bad, they kept fighting, and triumphed in the end. These primitive, cute, fuzzy things beat a technologically-advanced, far more powerful Imperial force. In fact, this was a huge thing for Lucas. He created the Ewoks for RotJ specifically to show this story. It was also not that long after Vietnam. I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't doubt that helped him shape the story.

So, the "cute" factor is important in RotJ, but it's to show that these cute, primitive underdogs can be particularly courageous and fight a far-superior Empire. It's to show that these cuddly little things can mount a strong resistance to Imperial forces which have impeded on their home. It's to show that the massively under-armed and under-manned Ewoks can win. By creating such a ridiculous underdog, Lucas actually shows us that we can all be strong enough to stand up against injustice, and that we might actually succeed.

In summary...the Ewoks are cute, sure, but they're cute so as to show us to struggle against injustice in the world. Because, hell, if those cuddly little Ewoks did it and succeeded, what's our excuse? Cute in RotJ isn't about cute, it's about courage, resistance, willpower, and success. Couple that with the theme of redemption (Vader's turn back to the Force, even though it kills him), and you've got a great movie. Probably the most political of the three original Star Wars movies - as I've made clear, there are parallels between the Ewok situation and alliance issues during the Cold War, guerrilla warfare tactics, the Vietnam War (considering the timing, I have to believe that played a major role in how the script was written), and sovereignty problems (like the drone attacks in Pakistan, and the presence of Guantanamo Bay in Castro's Cuba). Is that to say RotJ is exactly like any of the above? Not exactly. But the fact that the Ewok subplot has so many similarities to these serious political issues says something. Namely, even though it may not be as good a movie as Empire, RotJ is a damn good movie, and particularly because of the Ewoks' struggles and eventual triumph. So stop hating!